Summary
The post-launch content updates thatMinecraftoften receives are the lifeblood of the sandbox title, providing a fresh wave of experiences for fans to explore and enjoy. While the content of these updates usually follows a shared theme, they are sometimes shaken-up with an annual Mob Vote that lets the community decide which single new mob out of three choices gets to be added to the game.
The Mob Votes ofMinecraftwere once seen as a fantastic way to give the community a leading voice in what content is added to the game, but in recent years this sentiment has turned sour. As players become more displeased with the lack of engaging content that is coming toMinecraft, the limited scope of what the Mob Vote offers now creates as much animosity as it does excitement.
RELATED:Minecraft Player Makes Fully Functioning Destiny 2 Inspired Server With Maps, Weapons, and More
The Pros and Cons of Minecraft’s Mob Vote
Mob Votes were first introduced toMinecraftin 2017, marking a new era for how Mojang approached the introduction of some of the game’s most important new content.New mobs are a huge point of interest forMinecraft’s community, adding a level of interactivity to the game that cannot be found in other content such as new building materials. These votes offer three distinct mob choices that usually impact different areas ofMinecraft’s gameplay, ranging from hostile to passive mobs that can impact things like farming, combat, or mining.
At its core, the benefits of the Mob Vote are plentiful due to the level of community-led discussion that they create, with the chosen mob ideally reflecting the wishes of the majority of the game’s fan base. Over time, however, this upside has been significantly tarnished, with theMob Vote now representing one of the most glaring issuesthatMinecraft’s community has to contend with.
In recent years, Mojang has been criticized for thelack of meaningful content that is being added toMinecraft, with many fans feeling like they are being drip fed content that could be coming at a much quicker pace. With this in mind, the fact that Mojang is making players choose between three mobs only to add one can be seen as quite insulting, with many believing that all three mobs of a given vote could easily be added with no real issue.
This is back-dropped by the Mob Vote feeling unfair to begin with, as high-profileMinecraftcontent creators have been alleged to influence the vote through their audiences over the years.The most recent Mob Votegenerated the most controversy of any previous year, even leading to some tongue-in-cheek memes from the community that called for a revolution against Mojang’s control over what content is added to the game.
In all fairness, the Armadillo winner of this year’s Mob Vote is set tointroduce some fascinating mechanics like Wolf Armor, which has gone down quite well with the community. Despite this, the issue ofMinecraft’s sparse content problem is still a glaring one, and the Mob Vote has only served to highlight the growing discontent within the title’s community. While Mob Votes can still be seen in a positive light thanks to the power it gives to fans in theory, the way that these votes only offer a glimpse at content that will never be added to the title gives them an inherent downside that is hard to ignore.
Minecraftis available on Mobile, PC, PS4, Switch, Xbox One, and legacy platforms.
MORE:Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom DLC for Minecraft Would be a Match Made in Heaven
